Prediction of Evonne Goolagong vs Greer Stevens Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Goolagong vs G. Stevens

Evonne Goolagong

AUS

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Greer Stevens

RSA

3

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Goolagong 3 - 1 Stevens

They have played 8 sets in total, with Evonne Goolagong winning 6 and Greer Stevens winning 2. The last match between Evonne Goolagong and Greer Stevens was at the Oakland, 11-02-1980, Round: , Surface: Carpet, with Evonne Goolagong getting the victory 7-6 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Goolagong	3
Stevens	1

Last 4 H2H Matches:

() Oakland(02-11-80)

Stats

Evonne Goolagong

Greer Stevens

() Kansas City(01-14-80)

Stats

Greer Stevens

Evonne Goolagong

(R4) Sydney(11-30-76)

Stats

Evonne Goolagong

Greer Stevens

E. Goolagong vs G. Stevens H2H Profile

E. Goolagong	Stats	G. Stevens
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
81.28% (799-184)	Career Total W/L	61.51% (147-92)
1	Grass	0
2	Indoor	1
11	Titles	0
3	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. Goolagong vs G. Stevens Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evonne Goolagong has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Greer Stevens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evonne Goolagong, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Greer Stevens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Evonne Goolagong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Greer Stevens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Evonne Goolagong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Greer Stevens winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Evonne Goolagong has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 84% (W/L 220/43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 41/20). Greer Stevens has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 84% (W/L 44/13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/5).
Player level: In the last year, Evonne Goolagong has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Greer Stevens has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Evonne Goolagong winning 3 times and Greer Stevens being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Evonne Goolagong winning 6 and Greer Stevens winning 2.
The last match between Evonne Goolagong and Greer Stevens was at the Oakland, 11-02-1980, Round: , Surface: Carpet, with Evonne Goolagong getting the victory 7-6 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evonne Goolagong has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Greer Stevens has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evonne Goolagong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Greer Stevens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Evonne Goolagong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Greer Stevens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Evonne Goolagong vs Greer Stevens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Goolagong vs G. Stevens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. Goolagong	Stats	G. Stevens
3	H2H Matches Won	1
6	Sets Won	2
45	Games Won	30
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
75% (3/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	25% (1/4)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

E. Goolagong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Indoor - 06-05-1985
R3 Amanda TobinA. Tobin	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Birmingham - 03-06-1983
R4 Anne WhiteA. White	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
R3 Jennifer MundelJ. Mundel	W	6-1 3-6 8-6	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 23-05-1983
R3 Chris EvertC. Evert	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R2 Camille BenjaminC. Benjamin	W	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

G. Stevens Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney - 01-12-1980
R3 Barbara HallquistB. Hallquist	W	6-0 6-3	Stats
Sylvia HanikaS. Hanika	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
R4 Marie PinterovaM. Pinterova	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
Australian Open - 24-11-1980
R3 Susan LeoS. Leo	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R4 Lindsay MorseL. Morse	W	6-7 6-0 6-0	Stats

View All

E. Goolagong vs G. Stevens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. Goolagong	Stats	G. Stevens
81.28% (799/184)	YTD Win/Loss	61.51% (147/92)
76.71% (1644/499)	Sets Win/Loss	59.50% (310/211)
61.88% (11753/7241)	Games Win/Loss	54.72% (2561/2119)
67.21% (41/20)	Hard Win/Loss	61.54% (24/15)
83.65% (220/43)	Clay Win/Loss	37.50% (3/5)
78.97% (154/41)	Indoor Hard W/L	55.21% (53/43)
83.33% (220/44)	Grass Win/Loss	77.19% (44/13)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
72.57	Average Opponent Rank	127.9
78.38% (29/8)	Slam W/L	66.67% (2/1)
80.65% (25/6)	Cups W/L	75.00% (3/1)
82.45% (155/33)	Futures W/L	59.46% (22/15)
82% (790/965)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (141/227)
50% (1/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
57% (27/47)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/2)
71% (145/204)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (34/57)
96% (736/709)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (140/128)
4% (736/27)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (140/12)
36% (234/84)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (96/17)